Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 23:55

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How does an experienced gay/bi guy handle a bi-courius guy on his first time?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Northern Lights Alert: 8 States May See Aurora Borealis Monday Night - Forbes
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Can Taking Vitamins Fight Infection? Scientists Explain - SciTechDaily
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Which is the better research AI than Chat GPT?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is Matt Gaetz qualified to be Attorney General of the United States?